What I will probably do is test once and then again 1/10th second later. My
relays go to temperature sensors, so they will not be opening and closing at
too high a rate of speed.
Thans for all the advice, guys!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ucsimm@uClinux.com [mailto:owner-ucsimm@uClinux.com]On
> Behalf Of Ian Leonard
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 4:45 AM
> To: ucsimm@uClinux.com
> Subject: Re: [uCsimm] SIMM hardware question
> On 2001.02.20 16:38:27 +0000 Jean-Marie Bussat wrote:
> > > I am working on a project in which I need to process inputs
> from a couple
> > > relays (i.e. the relay is either open or closed by an
> external source). Is
> > > it acceptable to simply use the relay to feed +3.3V from the
> uCgardener to
> > > one of the PDx pins, or does it need 5V, or is something else needed?
> > But, if you plan to use them in an interrupt driven system (i.e. you
> > will look for an edge/change of the contact state), you will need an
> > "anti-ringging" circuit since when a relay contact closes or opens,
> > it doesn't not do that in a very "clean" way. You may have successive
> > closing/opening of the contact before it reach its mechanical stable
> > state. This may generate spurious interrupts that may confuse your
> > program.
> > "anti-ringging" circuits can be as simple as a R/C network or it
> > can be made using a monostable. It also exists some integrated
> > circuits that are doing this job (I dont remember any reference...).
> Could you not just wait for a few ms (maybe quite a few) and then test
> the input to make sure it's valid?
> Ian Leonard
> eMail: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Phone: +44 (0)1865 765273 Fax: +44 (0)1865 765280
> Please ignore spelling and punctuation - I did.
> This message resent by the email@example.com list server
This message resent by the firstname.lastname@example.org list server http://www.uClinux.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:41 EST