[uCsimm] Re: [UCLINUX] uClinux 2.2 or 2.4?

From: Erwin Authried (eauth@softsys.co.at)
Date: Fri Dec 01 2000 - 14:17:42 EST

Having uClinux for 2.2 or 2.4 would be an advantage for development of
drivers and filesystem. Most current developments don't care much about
older kernel versions, and there are some new kernel features that make
porting back sometimes difficult. I'm thinking of MTD and JFFS, for example.
I have done some work for MTD so that the current CVS version ís usable
for 2.0, but only the most important modules have been ported back. The
latest JFFS sources are not usable for 2.0, as far as I know. I'm aware
that even with 2.4 uClinux some changes to drivers would be required,
but that would less difficult than porting the source back to 2.0.



-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Geoffrey Wossum [SMTP:gpw0341@omega.uta.edu]
Gesendet am: Freitag, 01. Dezember 2000 19:42
An: uclinux@c3po.kc-inc.net
Cc: ucsimm@uClinux.com
Betreff: [UCLINUX] uClinux 2.2 or 2.4?

Hello all,

Is anyone working/planning to create 2.2 or 2.4 series uClinux kernels? I
don't think there's any compelling technology reason to go to newer
kernels. However, it's difficult to explain that to someone outside the
uClinux development community. When you tell someone that your little box
is running 2.0.38, they suddenly don't think as much of it.

Geoffrey Wossum
Project AKO - http://rover1.uta.edu/~ako
Internet Imperialists - http://inetimperial.sourceforge.net

This message resent by the ucsimm@uclinux.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:39 EST