Actually cards are supposed to work in both kinds of systems
At 03:27 AM 10/7/2000, you wrote:
>Sebastian Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 11:08:19AM -0400, Tom Walsh wrote:
> > > Glenn,
> > >
> > > Seems like we both need the same thing, a working CF drive
> system. I
> > > am curious as to why you are going with the True IDE mode as opposed to
> > > the Memory Mapped mode of the CF? Have you looked into the IDE drive
> > > code under uClinux, how big a job will it be to rewrite the ide.c stuff?
> > Is Memory Mapped Mode supported by real CF harddrives like IBMs
> > small 1GB drive?
> > We choose True IDE Mode in a custom hardware device of ours so we
> > could reuse the design/code if we wanted to add a real HD via an IDE
> > cable.
>Is the compact flash a 3.3 or 5 volt device, the spec suggests that
>there are either two types of CF or the devices are capable of either
>Tom Walsh - WN3L - Embedded Systems Consultant
>"Windows? No thanks, I have work to do..."
>This message resent by the firstname.lastname@example.org list server
This message resent by the email@example.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:38 EST