The uClinux environent implicitly supports a threaded model as there is
a single flat address space (therefore address xxx for one process is
adresss xxx for another). The question is, is there a pthread library,
and does it support the normal 1003.1c IPC's (mutexes and condition
variables). Anyone know the answer ???
> Since uClinux is geared towards MMU-less processors, it is very difficult
> to offer extensive thread support. The only way to support threads with
> uClinux would be to write your own thread-wrappers. This would allow some
> to exist, but would still not provide a stable environment for
> multi-threaded applications. Without an MMU, multiple threads can easily
> walk over each others space in memory, making it very difficult to manage
> these kinds of applications. Currently, the infrastructure for thread
> support does exist, but it has not been tested and may be somewhat buggy.
> Damon Stewart
> Technical Support
> Lineo, Inc.
> From: "Johan Severeyns" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <ucsimm@uClinux.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 11:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [uCsimm] phtreads (follow-up) ???
> Johan Severeyns wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Did anyone already try to build an application, statically linked
> > with the pthreads lib ? What trouble could I expect ?
> > I read a rather disturbing email in the list about the uClinux libc
> > NOT being thread aware. Is this true ?
> > (I am already starting to panic here ...)
> > A little background info:
> > The project I am working on requires me to port a piece of
> > windows Win32 C source to the uCSimm. That piece of code definitely
> > requires threading support.
> > I have got a lot of experience writing threaded applications on windows.
> > Linux threading is new to me, but the concept should be the same.
> > I chose pthreads because it seems to be a popular library, however
> > this does not need to be the final choice. Any advice here ?
> > By the way: Is it normal that it takes 3 hours to see my own post on the
> > list ?
> > The mail is immediately delivered to your server, as show my logs, but
> > it seems to be processed very slowly by the list server.
> > This certainly does make communicating tough along with the 7 hours of
> > timezone difference.
> > --
> > Johan Severeyns
> > R&D Engineer, Network Administrator
> > IDCS N.V.
This message resent by the email@example.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:38 EST