Re: [uCsimm] RT for uClinux

From: David Smead (smead@amplepower.com)
Date: Thu Apr 13 2000 - 12:02:44 EDT


kwonsk,

Great work!!!!

Sincerely,

David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.
http://www.ampletech.com.

On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, 권석근 wrote:

> Hi, all.
>
> Improving RTsupport for uClinux (EZ328) was done.
> internal timer handling code was changed. Instead of using restarting mode,
> new code is using free run mode. this change removed timer overrun
> (occur when TCMP is smaller than interrupt latency).
>
> It's timing result is very impressive to me. Toggling example (same code as
> previous
> release) shows almost no drift. It might be bellow 50 usec. I could not
> say exact
> timing because of my poor analog oscilloscope.
>
> I'm preparing diff for you, and you could get it soon.
> Some measurement :
> 1) from h/w interrupt to rt_oneshot_timer_irq = ~50 usec
> 2) time for rtl_schduler (priority resolver) = ~80 usec
>
> therefore time from actual h/w interrupt signal to corresponding rt_task
> is about 130 usec. and this time is almost constant (tested with
> memory logging free-running TCN value and scope). This latency
> could be reduced with asm code but it sacrifies portability and
> easy maintenance. Do not request too much for this little lovely EZ328
> please. :-)
>
> Q) why need about 130 usec? A) RTIME calc needs more instructions.
>
> Ping flood test (network load) did not change this value significantly.
>
> Thanks.
> kwonsk.
>
>
>
> This message resent by the ucsimm@uclinux.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/
>

This message resent by the ucsimm@uclinux.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:35 EST