The things I like about these switchers (if they were to work correctly)
is that my battery voltage can drop to one volt before it stops operating,
and I doubt you'd find a linear supply that could generate -5v from two
BTW, it's "micah" not mitch
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS d- s:+ a--- C++ UL++++ P++++ L++ E W+++ N+ o K- w---
O M- V- PS PE+ Y+ PGP t 5 X+ R- tv b+ DI+ D+
G e- h! !r y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Uwe Hahn wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, Robert Poor wrote:
> > Uwe/Mitch:
> > Just to clarify one point: Mitch is using switching regulators;
> > the TI part is a linear regulator. Since efficiency is the issue,
> > a linear regulator probably isn't the way to go.
> > I've not worked with the MAX717 or 722, but with all switchers,
> > you have to pay close attention to the choice of capacitors (low
> > ESR), MOSFET, and circuit layout.
> Right. I know about the difference in design and power
> consumption, I myself am working on a battery-powered design
> which is supposed to be compact.
> The low-dropout design of the serial regulator I was
> referring to makes it a good alternative to the MAX parts.
> And they are _so_ easy to handle...
> Just my idea, but of course, if power consumption is the
> primary issue, you will not get around switching supplies
> and the somewhat tedious external component selection, I
> suppose. Thank you for the note, Robert.
> This message resent by the email@example.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/
This message resent by the firstname.lastname@example.org list server http://www.uClinux.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:35 EST