RE: [uCsimm] Using two or mor uCsimms together??

From: Edmund Troche (ETroche@IRSINC.com)
Date: Mon Feb 07 2000 - 13:26:50 EST


I'm interested in that 486/100Mhz for $100. Where can we get one.

Edmund

-----Original Message-----
From: mummy [mailto:mummytoes@altavista.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 10:18 AM
To: ucsimm@uClinux.com
Subject: RE: [uCsimm] Using two or mor uCsimms together??

On Sun, 06 February 2000, Stu wrote:

> In-Reply-To: <389D53A8.DA955381@sbox.tu-graz.ac.at>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Sender: owner-ucsimm@uClinux.com
> To: ucsimm@uClinux.com
> Delivered-To: altavista.com%mummytoes@altavista.com
> Received: (cpmta 4672 invoked from network); 6 Feb 2000 05:33:59 -0800
> from download2.pa.alta-vista.net (204.152.191.76)
> by smtp.c012.sfo.cp.net with SMTP; 6 Feb 2000 05:33:59 -0800
> from ns1.rt-control.com ([209.167.190.118])
> by download2.pa.alta-vista.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA26875
> for <mummytoes@altavista.com>; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 05:33:59 -0800 (PST)
> (from mdom@localhost)
> by ns1.rt-control.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA03590
> for ucsimm-list; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 11:54:11 GMT
> X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Length: 1527
> X-Received: 6 Feb 2000 13:33:59 GMT
> X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
> Precedence: bulk
> Subject: RE: [uCsimm] Using two or mor uCsimms together??
> Importance: Normal
> From: Stu <doktor1@earthlink.net>
> X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
> Return-Path: <owner-ucsimm@uClinux.com>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Reply-To: ucsimm@uClinux.com
> Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2000 03:57:23 -0800
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
> Message-Id: <000501bf7099$54731a80$2be166d8@kadath.org>
>
> > Hi
> > 1a) Is it possible to use two ore more uCsimms together in a device??
> > should be something like a Multiprozessor system and/or
cluster???
> > What would be necessary to lokk at, if grouping and/or
> > clustering would
> > be
> > possible???
>
> No reason why not, but plenty of reasons why you'd want to use a 386 or
> something similar instead (i.e. twice as fast and 1/10th as expensive).
>
> > 1b) If 1a) is possible would this be supported ba uClinux or
> > would one have to
> > do some
> > coding to support the multiprozessors/clusters???
>
> I'm pretty sure they removed multiprocessor support to make the kernel
tree
> smaller. Why would you want to cluster them to begin with?
>
> > 2) is the uCsimm package double ore single sided??
> > means are the chips mounte on one side of the simm or on both ??
>
> All the *chips* are on one side, but there are a couple SMDs on the back.
>
> Seriously, if you need a cluster, the uCsimm is about the least economical
> way to build one. Think about it. A uCsimm costs nearly $200. You can get
a
> 486/100 that will run about 20 times faster (the chip, motherboard,
memory,
> etc.) for about $100. And that 486 has the ability to offer memory
> protection and native floating point math. Believe me, we had this
argument
> on the list about half a year ago.

Stu
I missed the discussion last year. Where can I obtain the 486 you describe
for $100?
mummy

Building a uCsimm cluster might be a cute
> science experiment but it would be extremely impractical, both in terms of
> horsepower and money.
>
>
> This message resent by the ucsimm@uclinux.com list server
http://www.uClinux.com/

______________________________________________________________

Free Internet Access from AltaVista: Get it, share it & win!
http://freeaccess.altavista.com/pika/www/initweb.jsp

This message resent by the ucsimm@uclinux.com list server
http://www.uClinux.com/
This message resent by the ucsimm@uclinux.com list server http://www.uClinux.com/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sun Apr 07 2002 - 00:01:34 EST