From: Erik Andersen (andersen@codepoet.org)
Date: Thu Mar 21 2002 - 21:55:17 EST
On Thu Mar 21, 2002 at 11:22:38AM -0800, Fabrice Gautier wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Erik Andersen [mailto:andersen@codepoet.org] > > Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 3:52 AM > > To: uClibc > > Cc: uclinux-dev@uclinux.org > > Subject: [uClibc]uClibc 0.9.10 released > > > > availability of uClibc 0.9.10. This release adds pthreads support > > (including pthreads support for mmu-less systems!). > > What is you level of confidence in the stability of the pthread code, and > the thread-safeness of uClibc , especially in a non-mmu target ? It works. Not all thread safe interfaces are implemented yet. Most interfaces requiring thread safety are, but I have not yet done a through thread safety audit. > Also will gdb correctly debug multi-threaded applications linked with > uClibc? gdb does not yet correctly debug applications using uClibc + threads, so I have no cause to expect it to work properly for mmu-less yet. > (In a word, If i'm going to use threads, do I have to expect headaches > debugging ?) So far, yes. You will really want to debug things on your host system as much as possible before deploying a threaded app on an mmu-less system. -Erik -- Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/ --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons-- This message resent by the uclinux-dev@uclinux.org list server http://www.uClinux.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 19 2002 - 13:21:02 EDT