From: David McCullough (davidm@snapgear.com)
Date: Sun Nov 04 2001 - 17:22:15 EST
Jivin Mark Barton lays it down ... > David, > > Ahh, now I see. What about the uClibc from CVS? There is an old uClibc > directory which seems to be close to what is in the 20010622 distribution The 20010622 libc and the uClibc-old have the same foundations, it's just the we have continued to fix and extend the 20010622 version. You will be much better served by it ;-) > and uClibc that has undergone some rather extensive changes. Can I checkout > the new version as a direct replacement for the lib subdirectory, or is > there more surgery required for this? You can, but I suggest you just go with the 20010622 version. We release products based on this version, so you can be sure it is maintained. If you are really serious on changing everything, the 20010622 build already has some support for the uClibc from CVS. If there is a uClibc directory in the root dir of the 20010622, the 'make config' allows you to select 'uClibc' or 'uC-libc' as your 'C' library. This support was still fairly simple in the 20010622 release, but I think some targets (ie, xcopilot) may even have a uClibc config in the tree. I know you will have some problems if you try this, there were still some uClibc integration issues in the 20010622 version, Cheers, Davidm -- David McCullough: Ph: +61 7 3435 2815 http://www.SnapGear.com davidm@snapgear.com Fx: +61 7 3891 3630 825 Stanley St., W'gabba QLD 4102, Oz This message resent by the uclinux-dev@uclinux.org list server http://www.uClinux.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 19 2002 - 13:20:22 EDT