[uClinux-dev] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:46:22 +1100

From: FAZIO,VINCENT (Non-HP-Australia,ex2) (vincent_fazio@non.hp.com)
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 19:58:39 EST

• Next message: Bruce Christensen: "[uClinux-dev] Communication between tasks"
• Previous message: Tom Walsh: "[uClinux-dev] Bad def in include/asm/MC68EZ328.h"
• Next in thread: David McCullough: "Re: [uClinux-dev] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:46:22 +1100"
• Reply: David McCullough: "Re: [uClinux-dev] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:46:22 +1100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I am considering porting some sort of C library (ucLibc or glibc) to the
Hitachi SH processor, for uClinux. For both libraries there is some machine
code to be rewritten, and a recompilation. Is the ONLY difference between
ucLibc and glibc their size? I could just as easily use glibc, right?


Another question: has anyone tried to use non-relocatable (non-PIC) execs
with uClinux? As long as memory placement is carefully planned and there's
only a few applications needed anyway, it will work?

Thanks for any ideas.

Vincent.
This message resent by the uclinux-dev@uclinux.org list server http://www.uClinux.org/

• Next message: Bruce Christensen: "[uClinux-dev] Communication between tasks"
• Previous message: Tom Walsh: "[uClinux-dev] Bad def in include/asm/MC68EZ328.h"
• Next in thread: David McCullough: "Re: [uClinux-dev] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:46:22 +1100"
• Reply: David McCullough: "Re: [uClinux-dev] Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:46:22 +1100"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 19 2002 - 13:19:28 EDT